Embodied carbon: 40% of emissions that no one counted

Up to 40% of the carbon a building produces over its lifetime is hidden in its materials. It is the greatest margin for improvement and, for years, the most ignored.

Embodied carbon is what is generated in the extraction, manufacture and transport of construction products, plus what comes from the installation and, finally, its dismantling. Unlike the energy consumption in use, it is not seen and does not appear on any bill, but it is equally present in every cubic meter of concrete, in every ton of steel and in every square meter of insulation.

This impact can be significantly reduced with technical decisions: choosing materials with a low footprint, optimizing structural sections to use less mass, prioritizing products with recycled content and choosing solutions that can be reused or recycled at the end of their useful life. Some renewable materials, such as sustainably sourced wood, can store more carbon than they emit during their production.

For a manufacturer, knowing and declaring the footprint of their products through an Environmental Product Declaration (EPD) is no longer an optional added value to become a market requirement: it is the data that specifiers and construction companies need to justify the footprint of the entire building.

How can we help you?

We guide you in sustainability and regulatory compliance so that your business grows with impact and safety.

[UPDATE]

Energy renovation: a profitable and sustainable investment opportunity

November 16, 2023

Cities are crucial in the fight against climate change. They are responsible for 70% of global emissions, and occupy only 3% of the Earth’s surface.

Biodiversity at risk: what the IPCC and IPBES report demands of companies

September 10, 2025

Although the IPCC is known for its climate reports, its work also highlights the intimate links between climate change and biodiversity. At the same time, the IPBES platform (the “IPCC of biodiversity”) has published recent studies that warn about the accelerated loss of nature and its global impacts.

Vegetable Egg vs Chicken Egg: Results of Life Cycle Analysis with UOBO

April 24, 2025

Since the emergence of plant-based foods, a recurring question is: how much more sustainable is a plant-based substitute compared to the conventional one? We have carried out a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between UOBO’s plant-based egg and traditional chicken egg, seeking to measure the real environmental impacts and be able to communicate with data, not with empty promises.