Operational Carbon and Embodied Carbon: Why You Need to Measure the Entire Life Cycle

For decades we have measured only the energy that a building consumes in use. Today we know that this picture is incomplete: the carbon incorporated into the materials decides much of the total impact.

Whole life carbon is the sum of all the emissions generated by a building throughout its existence, from the manufacture of materials to demolition and waste management. It is divided into two categories: operational carbon, associated with the daily consumption of the building (air conditioning, ventilation, lighting), and embodied carbon, contained in the production, transport, construction and end of life of materials.

As new buildings become more efficient in the use phase, the relative weight of embodied carbon grows. In high-efficiency new buildings, it can account for half of the emissions of the entire life cycle, a part that is often left out of the calculation because it was generated before the building came into operation.

The practical consequence is clear: the decisions that most condition the footprint of a building are made in the design phase, when the shape, structure, materials and systems can still be chosen. That is why the life cycle analysis must be part of the initial specification of the project, and not be a calculation that is made at the end to justify a certification. Measuring in time is what allows us to decide.

How can we help you?

We guide you in sustainability and regulatory compliance so that your business grows with impact and safety.

[UPDATE]

Energy renovation: a profitable and sustainable investment opportunity

November 16, 2023

Cities are crucial in the fight against climate change. They are responsible for 70% of global emissions, and occupy only 3% of the Earth’s surface.

Vegetable Egg vs Chicken Egg: Results of Life Cycle Analysis with UOBO

April 24, 2025

Since the emergence of plant-based foods, a recurring question is: how much more sustainable is a plant-based substitute compared to the conventional one? We have carried out a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between UOBO’s plant-based egg and traditional chicken egg, seeking to measure the real environmental impacts and be able to communicate with data, not with empty promises.

2025 revision of the EU Taxonomy: how does the flow of green funds affect companies?

September 25, 2025

The EU Green Taxonomy is a classification system designed to define which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. In 2025, key updates have been promoted that affect ESG reporting, financing criteria and corporate alignment.