Passive design, first: how to reduce demand by up to 65% before installing anything

Before thinking about equipment and facilities, a good bioclimatic design can drastically reduce a building's energy demand. It is the most cost-effective measure and often the most forgotten.

The decarbonization of a building starts by needing less energy. The so-called passive measures (orientation, compactness of the volume, composition and insulation of the envelope, sun protection or natural ventilation and lighting) take advantage of the climatic conditions of the environment without consuming energy directly. Properly applied, they can reduce the energy demand of a building by up to 65%, increasing the hours a year in which it operates with almost zero consumption.

That is why these measures are a priority over the active ones. A poorly oriented or poorly insulated building will always force you to oversize the air conditioning to compensate for its poor behavior; On the other hand, a building that is well designed from the ground up needs smaller equipment, which is cheaper to install and maintain, and emits less over its lifetime. The key decision is made on the project, not on the site.

Passive measurements do not completely eliminate the need for active systems, but they greatly reduce their load. The optimal combination, first reducing demand with design and then covering it with efficient equipment and renewable sources, is the most direct and cost-effective path to a low-emission building. It is also where good engineering makes the difference compared to a conventional project.

How can we help you?

We guide you in sustainability and regulatory compliance so that your business grows with impact and safety.

[UPDATE]

2025 revision of the EU Taxonomy: how does the flow of green funds affect companies?

September 25, 2025

The EU Green Taxonomy is a classification system designed to define which economic activities can be considered environmentally sustainable. In 2025, key updates have been promoted that affect ESG reporting, financing criteria and corporate alignment.

Vegetable Egg vs Chicken Egg: Results of Life Cycle Analysis with UOBO

April 24, 2025

Since the emergence of plant-based foods, a recurring question is: how much more sustainable is a plant-based substitute compared to the conventional one? We have carried out a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between UOBO’s plant-based egg and traditional chicken egg, seeking to measure the real environmental impacts and be able to communicate with data, not with empty promises.

The new EU Ecodesign Regulation and its impact on manufacturers and distributors

August 25, 2025

On 18 July 2024, the new Regulation (EU) 2024/1781, also known as the Ecodesign of Sustainable Products Regulation (ESPR), came into force. This regulation revolutionizes the existing ecodesign regulation by expanding its scope and introducing more ambitious obligations for manufacturers, distributors and operators of products in the European market.