Vegetable Egg vs Chicken Egg: Results of Life Cycle Analysis with UOBO

Since the emergence of plant-based foods, a recurring question is: how much more sustainable is a plant-based substitute compared to the conventional one? We have carried out a comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) between UOBO's plant-based egg and traditional chicken egg, seeking to measure the real environmental impacts and be able to communicate with data, not with empty promises.

“COMSAN has a significantly lower carbon footprint compared to plastic alternatives,” says the Envolta Global team.

What is a stroke and why is it relevant?

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a standardised methodology (ISO 14.040 / 14.044) that assesses the environmental impacts of a product throughout all its stages: extraction of raw materials, production, transport, use and end of life. By using an LCA, we avoid vague sustainability claims and can back up claims with verifiable figures.


For UOBO, this means being able to compare the greenhouse gas emissions, water consumption and land use of the plant-based egg versus a chicken egg, identifying at which stages there are the greatest opportunities for improvement.

UOBO would need 98% less water, 83% less soil and generate 93% less CO₂ emissions than the conventional egg.”

With a team of engineers and consultants with international experience, the firm integrates global best practices in the field of sustainability, always aligned with European policies and regulations.

Comparative LCA Results

According to data published in the media, UOBO would need 98% less water, 83% less soil and generate 93% less CO₂ emissions than conventional eggs. These figures reflect that the environmental footprint of the plant-based egg can drastically reduce the climate and ecological impact of this food category.


With these results, UOBO can communicate not only that it is more sustainable, but also in quantitative terms. This level of transparency provides credibility with consumers, distributors and restaurant channels.

Strategic value of measuring an LCA

  1. Avoid greenwashing: By backing up claims with LCA data, the risk of misleading marketing accusations is minimized.
  2. Identify critical points: broken down by phases, LCA reveals which stages (transport, cultivation, packaging) contribute most to the environmental impact, guiding improvement decisions.
  3. Strengthens communication: With verified figures, UOBO can build trust, differentiate itself and find spaces in markets with high ESG standards.
  4. Drive continuous improvement: Results serve as a baseline for setting reduction targets in subsequent product releases.

With the support of the LCA, UOBO is not only an innovative project from a food point of view, but also a serious commitment to sustainability based on verifiable data. For an emerging vegan brand, this transparency will be key to conquering new markets, convincing professional customers (catering, food service) and building a reputation as an environmentally conscious alternative.

How can we help you?

We guide you in sustainability and regulatory compliance so that your business grows with impact and safety.

[UPDATE]

Innovating in sustainable tourism with photovoltaic installations

June 9, 2023

Today we want to talk to you about the photovoltaic installations carried out in collaboration with Bypillow, a pioneering hotel chain in the Lowcost chic concept.

Transforming Energy: Reflections from the First Bioenergy Night

May 19, 2023

Thanks to the Bioenergia Catalunya Cluster for organizing this Bioenergy event, the engine of ecological transformation.

How we prepared CMTEC to overcome the EcoVadis challenge

February 15, 2025

The EcoVadis certification is widely recognized as a standard for evaluating the ESG performance of suppliers. Getting a good score opens doors in global supply chains and improves reputation with large customers.